I want to be selfish for once. This space is about me. I can talk and think, uninterrupted. Might be of relevance... or maybe not.

Wednesday, May 10, 2006

Federalism?

I happen to be reading Thomas Friedman's "From Beirut to Jerusalem" and things since the late 70's have not changed.

1)We are still divided into opposing Tribes.
2)Each fraction needs a leader.
3)We feel that we need so stab anyone in the back and try to get a bigger piece of the pie.

Maybe Bachir Gemayel was right in 1978. Maybe Samir Geagea was right 10 years later, in 1988.

Let's put an end to this masquerade. Federalism.

According to Albert Dicey, federalism depends on two prerequisites: One is "the
existence of a body of countries so closely connected by locality, by history, by race, or the like, as to be capable to bearing, in the eyes of their inhabitants, an impress of common nationality". The second condition is "the desire for national unity and the determination to maintain the independence of each man's separate State". It sounds like what we need.

At least then, we wont have a reason to argue anymore.

It is not giving up, it is not admitting defeat, but looking back since the early 40's we had sunni's siding with maronites, early 80's until early 90's tripartite pact of sunni-druze-chiites and now it looks like a new maronite-chiite agreement. And then what? vicious cycle over and over again.

Federalism is not dividing the country per se. Each fraction will have its own space, its own rules.

This is far from being ideal but living in continuous turmoil isn't helpful either.

What about those who believe that we feel we should be able to co-exist? What about idealists like Samir Kassir or Gebran Tueni who gave up their lives for that? Don't they deserve something?

Solutions such as overthrowing the current regime, getting rid of politicians who have been there since the civil war (examples too numerous to count; people like Jumblat, Berri or Geagea who few years ago were killing each other and now what?), changing the laws, and most importantly changing how people think about their national identity is a goal that looks so far away. Worse is, since the last year, since Beirut spring, this tension is gaining momentum. Instead of lebanese sticking together, they are as divided as hell.

WE NEED NEW BLOOD, NEW IDEAS, NEW POLITICIANS.

8 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

..iowa is 60 smthing the size of lebnen.51 other states make the federal system used as the model..after the first division, would we do subdivisions and subfederations?cause the problem that leads you to the intial division is present in all parts and indiviuals bel balad.and still, one plant would reuinite all..long live vegetarianism/nity..

5:17 AM

 
Blogger Paul said...

Dear Pat, Iowa misses you!
I don't think that size matters so much.
I might be wrong, but the differences between an american living on the east coast, west coast or in the midwest are not as sharp as one from Ashrafieh and one from Da7eyh, no?
2nd, irrespective of the degree of divergence, we are stubborn narrow minded people who are ready to start a fight for anything. We get emotional for nothing, this is part of our culture.
PS: thanks for the link. Gemayze did help after all.

3:35 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

dude, don't mean toot my own horn, but if u read me paper, it will give ya more insight about this idea. i would have to agree with u, but i would not call it federalism per se, cuz that is not an economically feasable or doable solution for such a small country that barely has a population of 3.5million. i mean for lebanon to have 5 or 6 phone companies is a bit ridiculous. but sth more along the lines of decentralization and empowering municipalities is a good first step and sth we can hope to achieve sooner than later. 7adeess yatul wa yatba3, sadeeqi! leik, who's picking u up from the airport. as long as u're not coming between 4-6, feel free to give me a shout via sms if u need a ride.
salalax

3:37 AM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

sounds like you're surprising your parents this time also? it's not about size my friend, it's about scientific laws of economics/sociology/politics, and common sense. I am not trying to start a scientific debate here, but i will ask you one question:no difference between a new yorker and a midwestern-er? to be continued once you are all jemmaized up ;)

6:19 AM

 
Blogger Paul said...

My friends, you make me realize how much I miss those long conversations that we used to have.
be ready for long talks, happy hour kind of things, captain! and yes, we will re-discuss your paper over and over again.
Pat, you seem already Jemmaized up! this is not fair, but i can catch up! PS: I like the "jemmaized up" expression!

8:51 AM

 
Blogger Laila K said...

waynak dude?

10:11 AM

 
Blogger Paul said...

L. that is so sweet of you to ask.
I am home, the real home, where every single detail has a meaning and bears a memory.
I am where I wish to be every single minute of my life.
I am going back to Iowa in less than 2 days. I wish I can go back now, and not have to go through goodbye's again.
Will find refuge on the net then...

6:07 AM

 
Blogger rouba said...

psssst, happy bday..

adolescence aw puberty? :)

2:18 AM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home